ARTICLE: “The Evolution Of Right to Health Under Indian Constitutional Scheme” By Harsh Vardhan Tiwari, 3rd Year Student, Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab.

Posted by

THE EVOLUTION OF RIGHT TO HEALTH UNDER INDIAN CONSTITUTIONAL SCHEME[*]

 

The Constitution of India, inspired by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, provides different Articles which focus on the fundamental human rights of the Citizens of the country.

Article 21[i] provides Right to life as one of the basic human right and not even the state has the authority to violate that right.[ii] The article ensures that Right to Livelihood and a good health is an integral facet of the right to life.[iii] The word ‘life’ in the Article refers to a life with dignity and human rights, and not just an animal life.[iv] The human rights jurisprudence in India got an impetus only after the Supreme Court employed a wider interpretation of right to life as under Article 21 in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India[v] where the Apex Court referred to the U. S. Supreme Court judgment in the case of Munn v. Illinois[vi]. Here, it was held that right to life doesn’t refer to mere animal existence but means a life with dignity and all basic human needs. The Supreme Court of India held that the Right to life included the right to lead a healthy life so as to enjoy all faculties of the human body in their prime conditions.[vii]

As understood under Article 21, the women’s right to make reproductive choices is also one of the facet of personal liberty. It is important to recognise women’s right to either procreate or abstain from procreating. The main objective is to respect women’s right to privacy, dignity and bodily integrity, and health.

In the case of West Bengal Farm Labourer’s Association v. The Government of West Bengal[viii], the Supreme Court has upheld a patient’s right to emergency Medicare as a right falling within the scope of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The Supreme Court further said that financial stringency of the State Exchequer is not a valid plea when the question is one of giving medical aid to preserve a human life.[ix]In Chameli Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh[x], the Court uplifting the importance of Health as an important facet of human right, held that Right to live guaranteed in any civilised society implies the right to food, water, decent environment, good health, medical care and shelter.

Under Article 22 of the Indian Constitution, the arrestee should be subjected to medical examination by a trained doctor every 48 hours during his detention in custody by a doctor on the panel of approved doctors appointed by Director, Health Services of the concerned State or Union Territory, Director, Health Services should prepare such a panel for all Tehsils and Districts as well.[xi] Both the European and Inter-American Courts have stated that there is an obligation to protect the physical and mental well being of detainees, including the provision of medical assistance.[xii] All the treaty bodies have held that not providing adequate medical care for detainees suffering from either physical[xiii] or mental[xiv] illness amounts to inhuman and/or degrading treatment because such lack of care does not respect the dignity inherent in human being.

 

[*]Harsh Vardhan Tiwari, 3rd Year Student, Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab.

 

[i]  The Constitution of India, 1950, Article 21. No Person shall be denied of his right to life and personal liberty except in accordance to the procedure established by law.

[ii] SiddharamSatlingappaMhetre v. State of Maharashtra, J.T. 2010 (13) S.C. 247 (India).

[iii] Narendra Kumar v. State of Haryana, J.T. (1994) 2 S.C. 94 (India).

[iv] BudhadevKarmaskar v. state of West Bengal, A.I.R. 2011 S.C. 2636 (India).

[v] Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, 1978 A.I.R. 597 (India).

[vi] Munn v. Illinois, 24 L. Ed. 77; 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1842; 4 Otto 113 (United States).

[vii] Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration, A.I.R. 1978 S.C. 1675 (India).

[viii] PashchimBangaKhetMazdoorSamiti v. State of West Bengal,(1996) 4 S.C.C. 37 (India).

[ix]  The Supreme Court said: “Not only are the government hospital, but the medical officers employed therein also liable to a charge of violating fundamental right, if they deny such admission.

[x] Chameli Singh v. State of U. P. (1996) 2 S.C.C. 549 (India).

[xi] D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal, A.I.R. 1997 S.C. 610 (India).

[xii] A & others v. United Kingdom Judgement (Grand Chamber), 19 February 2009, pg. 128; IACtHR,Tibi v. Equador, 7 September 2004, Pg. 153-157.

[xiii] Huri-Laws  v. Nigeria Com, Eg A ComHPR, 225/98, 6 November 2000, Pg. 41; Istratii and others v. Moldova, ECtHR, 27 March 2007, Pg. 46-58; Montero-Aranguran et al v. Venezuela, IACtHR, 5 July 2006, Pg. 101-103.

[xiv] Williams v. Jamaica Com, EgHRCte, 609/1995, Views, 4 November 1997, pg 6.5; Keenan v. United Kingdom, ECtHR,3 April 2001, pg. 114-116.

.

DISCLAIMER: The Contents of this Website are informative only and for the benefit of the general public. Even though every care has been taken to ensure the correctness of information and procedure, the www.lawof.in is not responsible for any inadvertent errors and the same may please be brought to the notice through e-mail: info@lawof.in The LawOF do not own any responsibility for the views expressed by the Author in the Article and for the errors, if any, in the information contained in the LawOF and the author shall be solely responsible for the same.

.

Facebook Comments
826

262 comments

  1. Pingback: Dungeon
  2. Pingback: DMPK
  3. Pingback: zd porn
  4. Pingback: hasj
  5. Pingback: Boliden
  6. Pingback: coehuman.uodiyala
  7. Pingback: pdr instruction
  8. Pingback: GVK BIO News
  9. Pingback: redes informática
  10. Pingback: forex trading
  11. Pingback: Free UK Chat
  12. Pingback: ppc service
  13. Pingback: freemoviesz
  14. Pingback: informática
  15. Pingback: warehouse for sale
  16. Pingback: 卷筒纸
  17. Pingback: niño deporte
  18. Pingback: ORM Services
  19. Pingback: more helpful hints
  20. Pingback: penis enlargement
  21. Pingback: 안전놀이터
  22. Pingback: bitcoin games
  23. Pingback: special info
  24. Pingback: big
  25. Pingback: try this
  26. Pingback: naked children
  27. Pingback: drotostot.hu
  28. Pingback: Minnesota
  29. Pingback: Metabolic Cycle
  30. Pingback: PK values in drugs
  31. Pingback: 토토사이트
  32. Pingback: actos 30 mg online
  33. Pingback: claritin tablets
  34. Pingback: real casino online
  35. Pingback: gambling casino
  36. Pingback: play casino online
  37. Pingback: casino slot
  38. Pingback: payday loans ohio
  39. Pingback: quick loans online
  40. Pingback: quick payday loans
  41. Pingback: free paper writer
  42. Pingback: colchicine cheap
  43. Pingback: coreg australia
  44. Pingback: buy cozaar 50 mg
  45. Pingback: diamox uk
  46. Pingback: elavil tablets
  47. Pingback: imdur 60mg uk
  48. Pingback: Homepage
  49. Pingback: imuran 50 mg price
  50. Pingback: lamisil australia
  51. Pingback: levaquin otc
  52. Pingback: lopid 300 mg otc
  53. Pingback: buy macrobid 100mg
  54. Pingback: buy meclizine
  55. Pingback: micardis online
  56. Pingback: proair inhaler usa
  57. Pingback: protonix otc
  58. Pingback: cheapest pulmicort
  59. Pingback: reglan purchase
  60. Pingback: remeron pharmacy
  61. Pingback: cheap revatio
  62. Pingback: rogaine cost
  63. Pingback: skelaxin coupon
  64. Pingback: spiriva usa
  65. Pingback: toprol generic
  66. Pingback: tricor for sale
  67. Pingback: wellbutrin prices
  68. Pingback: zestril for sale
  69. Pingback: cost of zocor
  70. Pingback: zovirax australia
  71. Pingback: zyloprim australia
  72. Pingback: order zyvox
  73. Pingback: tadalafil cost
  74. Pingback: aripiprazole pills
  75. Pingback: fexofenadine cheap
  76. Pingback: donepezil 5 mg nz
  77. Pingback: order dutasteride
  78. Pingback: buspirone tablet
  79. Pingback: order clindamycin
  80. Pingback: warfarin cheap
  81. Pingback: trazodone nz
  82. Pingback: buy permethrin 30g
  83. Pingback: cheapest estradiol
  84. Pingback: order lamotrigine
  85. Pingback: buy cheaper online
  86. Pingback: Anonymous
  87. Pingback: Anonymous
  88. Pingback: flccc ivermectin
  89. Pingback: cost of ivermectin
  90. Pingback: stromectol price
  91. Pingback: cialis amazon
  92. Pingback: sildenafil tablets
  93. Pingback: tadalafil vidal
  94. Pingback: what is cialis
  95. Pingback: ivermectin wormer

Comments are closed.